Archive for the ‘Wikileaks’ Category

Wikileaks: Kissinger Cables

Saturday, April 13th, 2013

Wikileaks: Kissinger Cables

The code behind the Public Library of US Diplomacy.

Another rich source of information for anyone creating a mapping of relationships and events in the early 1970′s.

My only puzzle over Wikileaks is their apparent focus on US diplomatic cables.

Where are the diplomatic cables of the former government in Egypt? Or the USSR? Or of any of the many existing regimes around the globe?

Surely those aren’t more difficult to obtain than those of the US?

Perhaps that would make an interesting topic map.

Those who could be exposed by Wikileaks but aren’t.

I first saw this as: Wikileaks ProjectK Code (Github) on Nat Torkington’s Four short links: 12 April 2013.

WikiLeaks as Wakeup Call?

Thursday, May 31st, 2012

Must be a slow news week. Federal Computer Week is recycling Wikileaks as a “wake up” call.

In case you have forgotten (or is that why the story is coming back up?), Robert Gates (Sec. of Defense) found that Wikileaks did not disclose sensitive intelligence sources or methods.

Hardly “…a security breach of epic proportions…” as claimed by the State Department.

If you want to claim Wikileaks was a “wakeup call,” make it a wake up call about “data dumpster” techniques for sharing intelligence data.

“Here are all our reports. Good luck finding something, anything.”

Security breach written all over it. Useless other than as material for a security breach. Easy to copy in bulk, etc.

What about this says “potential security breach” to you?

Best methods for sharing intelligence vary depending on the data, security requirements and a host of other factors. Take Wikileaks as motivation (if lacking before) to strive for useful intelligence sharing.

Not sharing for the sake of saying you are sharing.

Cablemap

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

Cablemap

Just in case you have been in a coma for the last 6 months or in solitary confinement, Wikileaks is publishing a set of diplomatic cables it describes as follows:

Wikileaks began on Sunday November 28th publishing 251,287 leaked United States embassy cables, the largest set of confidential documents ever to be released into the public domain. The documents will give people around the world an unprecedented insight into US Government foreign activities.

The cables, which date from 1966 up until the end of February this year, contain confidential communications between 274 embassies in countries throughout the world and the State Department in Washington DC. 15,652 of the cables are classified Secret.

….

The cables show the extent of US spying on its allies and the UN; turning a blind eye to corruption and human rights abuse in “client states”; backroom deals with supposedly neutral countries; lobbying for US corporations; and the measures US diplomats take to advance those who have access to them.

This document release reveals the contradictions between the US’s public persona and what it says behind closed doors – and shows that if citizens in a democracy want their governments to reflect their wishes, they should ask to see what’s going on behind the scenes.

The online treatments I have seen by the Guardian and the New York Times are more annoying than the parade of horrors suggested by US government sources.

True, the cables show diplomats to be venal and dishonest creatures in the service of even more venal and dishonest creatures but everyone outside of an asylum and over 12 years of age knew that already.

Just as everyone knew that US foreign policy benefits friends and benefactors of elected US officials, not the general U.S. population.

Here is the test: Look over all the diplomatic cables since 1966 and find one where the result benefited you personally. Now pick one at random and identify the person or group who benefited from the activity or policy discussed in the cable.

A topic map that matched up individuals or groups who benefited from the activities or policies discussed in the cables would be a step towards being more than annoying.

Topic mapping in Google map locations for those individuals or representatives of those groups, would be more than annoying still.

Add the ability to seamlessly integrate leaked information into another intelligence system, you are edging towards the potential of topic maps.

Cablemap is a step towards the production of a Cablegate resource that is more than simply annoying.