Another Word For It Patrick Durusau on Topic Maps and Semantic Diversity

May 29, 2020

Whitesplaining and Mansplaining: An Example

Filed under: Feminism,Protests — Patrick Durusau @ 7:36 pm

I was blocked by @LadyMenopause at the end of this exchange, so what follows are my views on “whitesplaining” and “mansplaining,” not hers.

Twitter Exchange, @LadyMenopause and @PatrickDurusau, May 28, 2020.

After sleeping on it, I think my posts were guilty of both “whitesplaining” and “mansplaining,” but have no idea what prompted @LadyMenopause’s response.

As far as “mansplaining,” the tweet that prompted by response by @LadyMenopause was not about protest tactics, targeting, the best ways to engage oppressors or anything of the sort. (I really need to start archiving my timeline.) So my initial response, suggesting better targeting for Republican majority areas, was off-topic and hijacking her thread, for a topic of no evidence interest to her.

Another aspect of “mansplaining” was my dismissal of her view of Republican areas as guarded by “rednecks with all their artillery in front of them….” Whatever I or you may think about that view of Republican areas in Minneapolis, it is her view. I continued to err in treating the topic as one about tactics and strategies, which were not her focus.

On “whitesplaining,” I am a child of a violent white culture and assume that resources and tactics can be whistled up with little or no difficulty. My perspective also does not account for members of the Black community, their hopes and desires, to say nothing of their interest (or lack thereof) in wading in their oppressors blood. Unlike some white people, I don’t think I can evaluate or even properly consider the hopes and desires of the Black community. To suggestion action anyway, is a form of “whitesplaining.”

I’m utterly convinced that Black people, women, and others have been, are and likely will be oppressed by the white male capitalist patriarchy. I have had no doubts on that score for decades. I try to not speak the language of the Empire but as you can see, I can and do fail. Apologies to anyone who was offended and should you be called out for either “mansplaining” or “whitesplaining,” perhaps this will be a good starting point to discover your error.

PS: When you see me falling into “mansplaining” or “whitesplaining,” I’d appreciate a comment, here or on Twitter. Thanks!

May 5, 2020

Six Degrees of Corona – McConnell Edition

Filed under: Politics,Social Networks,Weaponize Data,Weaponized Open Data — Patrick Durusau @ 7:08 pm

This post is an extension of Six Degrees of Corona (New OSINT Game) which you should read first.

Six Degrees of Corona – Mitch McConnell Edition

You know the gist of the game from its similarity to six degrees of Kevin Bacon, but where would you find information for McConnell? He has no known movie credits for constructing degrees of separation.

That’s easy enough to fix. Let’s do a short list and see what others add to it:

  1. Mitch McConnell, U.S. Senator from Kentucky – McConnell’s official website. Lots of data on him and people around him. Could do a lot worse as a starting point.
  2. Federal Election Commission – You are looking for major donors, the larger the better. $20 will get you a seat to see McConnell walking away from you. I’d discard anything less than $1K.
  3. Kentucky newspapers (by circulation): The Courier-Journal, Lexington Herald-Leader, Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer, Bowling Green Daily News, and, Ashland Independent. All of these will carry news about who met with McConnell, where McConnell appears at during campaigns, fund raisers, etc. (Think co-occurrence searches.)
  4. Campaign events, photograph everyone on stage but also support personnel, who come and go without even being seen. Run image recognition on your photos.

Other sources? Put your thinking hats on!

BTW, I should mention that completing your Six Degrees of Corona – Mitch McConnell edition by reducing the degrees of separation, say by becoming a waiter or busser is cheating. Complete the six degrees of separation.

May 4, 2020

Six Degrees of Corona (New OSINT Game)

Most of you have heard of “six degrees of Kevin Bacon,”

The game, which celebrates its 20th anniversary this year, requires players to link celebrities to Bacon, in as few steps as possible, via the movies they have in common. The more odd or random the celebrity, the better. For example, O.J. Simpson was in “The Naked Gun 33⅓” with Olympia Dukakis, who was in “Picture Perfect” with Kevin Bacon.

Kevin Bacon on ‘Six Degrees’ game: ‘I was horrified’ by Brandon Griggs. March 12, 2014.

The more general case, “six degrees of separation” between any two people in the world is usually shown as:

Generic Six Degress of Separation Diagram

Kevin Bacon is interesting for trivia purposes but he returns only 49K mentions on Twitter today. Compare President Trump grosses ~3.2 million and Joe Biden at ~2.6 million (both exact phrases so didn’t capture nicknames or obcenities).

To make an OSINT game, who are the people you can identify with either Donald Trump or Joe Biden? Those go between #5 and #6, then proceeding from them, who should go between #4 and #5? As you proceed right to left, it requires more digging to fish up people who can provide the bridge.

You will need all your OSINT skills as you compete against others to find the best path to people more popular, or should I say more notorious than Kevin Bacon?

Here are two templates, depending upon your political persuasion to get you started with the Six Degrees of Corona:

Six Degrees of Corona – Trump version.

Six Degrees of Corona – Biden version

Some wag is going to gift us with their deep legal knowledge to proclaim that intentional transmission of a disease is illegal. It’s also a violation of the Biological Weapons Convention. It’s also likely a battery (civil and criminal) in most jurisdictions. None of which is relevant to an OSINT game to sharpen your skills. The choices of images (you can supply your own) is only a matter of motivation.

Feel free to circulate these images or to create your own Six Degrees of Corona OSINT game, substituting other images as you deem appropriate.

PS: My money is on Jared being #5 for Trump. No data science for that opinion but he reeks of the closeness that would transmit most diseases.

May 2, 2020

Michigan: Cosplayers Come In Out Of Rain

Filed under: #DAPL,Politics,Protests — Patrick Durusau @ 4:47 pm

Protest in Michigan answers a lingering question from the 20th century, do ignorant white cosplayers do have enough sense to come in out of the rain?

One of the more popular images from protests at the Michagan State House seems to support the “storming” of the building by armed white folks.

Cosplayer in out of the rain.

The “storming” narrative is sweeping social media, driven by people who are soliciting your money, either now or soon. The problem is none, repeat none of the “storming” narratives is true. They are completely and utterly false! NBC captures what happened in a single paragraph:

As the protests moved indoors from the rainy steps of the Capitol, police took the temperatures of those entering the building using forehead thermometers, according to NBC affiliate WOOD of Grand Rapids.

Hundreds of protesters, some carrying guns in the state Capitol, demonstrate against Michigan’s emergency measures April 30, 2020 by Dartunorro Clark.

Armed white cosplayers, came in out of the rain in Michigan, after having their temperatures checked by the police. Not my idea of “storming” a state capital. Yours?

PS: Yes, police have reacted with extreme violence against unarmed Black Children (Children’s Crusade, Birmingham, AL May 2-3, 1963) and peaceful Native Americans (Standing Rock, for example, 2016-2017), but not against these armed white people. Your point? Over 500 years, white settlers have practiced and refined racism into the warp and woof of North America. Shaming it for being the society they built, one injustice at a time isn’t a winning strategy.

May 1, 2020

That’s Illegal!(?) (Happy May Day!)

Filed under: Protests,Weaponize Data,Weaponized Open Data — Patrick Durusau @ 8:36 pm

Apologies for the long silence! I haven’t been sick so much as disorganized and distracted. Working on both of those and hope to mark May Day 2020 by returning to regular blogging.

One persistent question, charge or comment that I get on Facebook and Twitter to some of my bolder suggestions is: That’s illegal! So far as I know, “legal” depends on who you are, not the act in question.

Take “terrorist” bombing for example. Every US president in my lifetime (let’s just say 60+ years) with one exception, Carter, has engaged in the murder of civilians in foreign countries, by bombing. By extension, so have the troops under their commands engaged in terrorist bombings/attacks.

The same is true for both CIA and other agency operatives who engage in acts most of us would describe as murder, torture, etc. We can conclude from the lack of consequences for their acts, someone thought their actions were legal.

But if I describe how to weaponize data in order to, in theory at least, to interfere with oil or gas pipelines, refineries, airports, some wag will interject: That’s illegal! As though that is meaningful in the face of crimes that will blight the lives of millions, or worse.

True enough, some act might be “illegal” in the eyes of a system rigged to benefit the wealthy and destroy the ecosphere, but isn’t that just a caution to not be apprehended? The “property rights” of oil and gas companies that are destroying this planet have no strings that tug at my heart. Especially when compared to the rights of children to grow up in healthy, sustainable environments.

That’s illegal! most often originates from people who, having secured privileges in the present system, are loathe to see it change. If Martin Luther King were alive today and in jail in Birmingham for protesting environmental crimes, they would be named addressees. (It’s sad that letter is most often reprinted sans the addressees names. We really should know who the moral cowards of previous generations were.)

Do some acts have more consequences than others? Sure, mugging for TV cameras to “draw attention” to an issue has consequences. Using IEDs or the threat of IEDs, punching holes in pipelines not yet in use, making pipelines fail under pressure, all of those increase costs and deter investors. Given the pathological greed of capitalism, do you think drawing attention or increasing construction costs on an exponential scale are more likely to be effective?

I freely concede if you want to preserve your present privileges, by all means, listen to those who want to sustain present exploitation of people and the environment. If you want to take a chance on having a meaningful impact for the better, treat cries of That’s illegal!, as booterism for a foul present.

That said, as always, consider your present status, CIA, FBI, NSA agent, contractor (Whitey Bolger?), US military, etc., and local laws, along with your appetite for risk, when evaluating whether you should or should not use techniques described herein.

PS: I may revisit/update some old classics like Steal This Book by Abbie Hoffman that has this great passage:

A special metallic bonding glue available from Eastman-Kodak will form a permanent bond in only 45 seconds. Gluing up locks of all the office buildings in your town is a great way to dramatize the fact that our brothers and sisters are being jailed all the time.

Of course you know this “special metallic bonding glue from Eastman-Kodak” by the more familiar name: Cyanoacrylate, no, sorry, “Super Glue.”

While honoring the source as Abbie Hoffman, be imaginative! Some random places where Super Glue could be appropriately applied: gas caps, lug nuts (esp. if caltrops are likely), suitcases, home/hotel/motel doors, laptops, traffic arms, anywhere with two surfaces in contact. (Be sure to check your status as a US mercenary before undertaking such uses.)

Powered by WordPress