Another Word For It Patrick Durusau on Topic Maps and Semantic Diversity

December 4, 2012

INSA Highlights Increasing Importance of Open Source

Filed under: Government,Government Data,Intelligence — Patrick Durusau @ 12:52 pm

INSA Highlights Increasing Importance of Open Source

From Recorded Future*:

The Intelligence and National Security Alliance (INSA) Rebalance Task Force recently released its new white paper “Expectations of Intelligence in the Information Age“.

We’re obviously big fans of open source analysis, so some of the lead observations reported by the task force really hit home. Here they are, as written by INSA:

  • The heightened expectations of decision makers for timely strategic warning and current intelligence can be addressed in significant ways by the IC through “open sourcing” of information.
  • “Open sourcing” will not replace traditional intelligence; decision makers will continue to expect the IC to extract those secrets others are determined to keep from the United States.
  • However, because decision makers will access open sources as readily as the IC, they will expect the IC to rapidly validate open source information and quickly meld it with that derived from espionage and traditional sources of collection to provide them with the knowledge desired to confidently address national security issues and events.

You can check out an interactive version of the full report here, and take a moment to visit Recorded Future to see how we’re embracing this synthesis of open source and confidential intelligence.

I have confidence that the IC will find ways to make their collection, recording, analysis and synthesis of information with traditional intelligence sources incompatible with each other.

After all, we are less than five (5) years away from some unknown level of sharing of traditional intelligence data: Read’em and Weep.

Let’s say there is some sort of intelligence sharing by 2017 (2012 + 5). That’s sixteen (16) years after 9/11.

Being mindful that sharing doesn’t mean integrated into the information flow of the respective agencies.

How does that saying go?

Once is happenstance.

Twice is coincidence.

Three times is enemy action?

Where does the continuing failure to share intelligence fall on that list?

(Topic maps can’t provide the incentives to make sharing happen, but they do make sharing possible for people with incentives to share.)


* I listed the entry as originating from Recorded Future. Why some blog authors find it difficult to identify themselves I cannot say.

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress