From the post:
In this fifth installment I will continue my description, this time covering days seven and eight of the project. As the title indicates, progress continues and I have another hybrid mind-meld moment. I also discover that the computer does not recognize the significance of references to God in an email. This makes sense logically, but is unexpected and kind of funny when encountered in a document review.
Ralph discovered new terms to use for training as the analysis of the documents progressed.
While Ralph captures those for his use, my question would be how to capture what he learned for re-use?
As in re-use by other parties, perhaps in other litigation.
Thinking of reducing the cost of discovery by sharing analysis of data sets, rather than every discovery process starting at ground zero.