Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM-2011)
From the conference website:
Ontology matching is a key interoperability enabler for the Semantic Web, as well as a useful tactic in some classical data integration tasks dealing with the semantic heterogeneity problem. It takes the ontologies as input and determines as output an alignment, that is, a set of correspondences between the semantically related entities of those ontologies. These correspondences can be used for various tasks, such as ontology merging, data translation, query answering or navigation on the web of data. Thus, matching ontologies enables the knowledge and data expressed in the matched ontologies to interoperate.
The workshop has three goals:
- To bring together leaders from academia, industry and user institutions to assess how academic advances are addressing real-world requirements. The workshop will strive to improve academic awareness of industrial and final user needs, and therefore direct research towards those needs. Simultaneously, the workshop will serve to inform industry and user representatives about existing research efforts that may meet their requirements. The workshop will also investigate how the ontology matching technology is going to evolve.
- To conduct an extensive and rigorous evaluation of ontology matching approaches through the OAEI (Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative) 2011 campaign. The particular focus of this year’s OAEI campaign is on real-world specific matching tasks involving, e.g., open linked data and biomedical ontologies. Therefore, the ontology matching evaluation initiative itself will provide a solid ground for discussion of how well the current approaches are meeting business needs.
- To examine similarities and differences from database schema matching, which has received decades of attention but is just beginning to transition to mainstream tools.
An excellent set of papers and posters.
While I was writing this post, I realized that had the papers been described as matching subject identifications by similarity measures, I would have felt completely different about the papers.
Isn’t that odd?
Question: Do you agree/disagree that mapping ontologies is different from mapping subject identifications? Why/why not?
[…] jQuery("#errors*").hide(); window.location= data.themeInternalUrl; } }); } tm.durusau.net – Today, 9:20 […]
Pingback by Ontology Matching 2011 « Another Word For It | Ontology, RDF Triples and Semantic Enrichment of Content | Scoop.it — December 22, 2011 @ 9:21 am