Another Word For It Patrick Durusau on Topic Maps and Semantic Diversity

January 28, 2012

Microsoft’s plan for Hadoop and big data

Filed under: BigData,Hadoop,Microsoft — Patrick Durusau @ 10:54 pm

Microsoft’s plan for Hadoop and big data by Edd Dumbill.

From the post:

Microsoft has placed Apache Hadoop at the core of its big data strategy. It’s a move that might seem surprising to the casual observer, being a somewhat enthusiastic adoption of a significant open source product.

The reason for this move is that Hadoop, by its sheer popularity, has become the de facto standard for distributed data crunching. By embracing Hadoop, Microsoft allows its customers to access the rapidly-growing Hadoop ecosystem and take advantage of a growing talent pool of Hadoop-savvy developers.

Microsoft’s goals go beyond integrating Hadoop into Windows. It intends to contribute the adaptions it makes back to the Apache Hadoop project, so that anybody can run a purely open source Hadoop on Windows.

If MS is taking the data integration road, isn’t that something your company needs to be thinking about?

There is all that data diversity that Hadoop processing is going to uncover, but I have some suggestions about that issue. 😉

Nothing but good can come of MS using Hadoop as an integration data appliance. MS customers will benefit and parts of MS won’t have to worry about stepping on each other. A natural outcome of hard coding into formats. But that is an issue for another day.

November 9, 2011

Microsoft Business Intelligence (BI) Resources

Filed under: Business Intelligence,Microsoft — Patrick Durusau @ 7:42 pm

Microsoft Business Intelligence (BI) Resources

Dan English posts a number of MS BI resources from a PowerView session.

I don’t have access to an MS Server environment so you will have to evaluate these resources on your own.

For historical reasons I have mostly worked in *nix server environments. I have never really been tempted to experiment with MS server products, although I must confess I have had my share of laptops/desktops that ran Windows software. (I have *nix and Windows boxes sharing monitors/keyboard even now.)

With hardware prices where they are, perhaps I should setup a Windows server box (behind my firewall, etc.) so I can test some of these applications.

Wondering what it would take to put subject identity tests, a semantic shim as it were on top of these products to offer some enhanced value to their users? True enough, if popular MS would absorb it in a future release but isn’t that what progress is about?

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress