RDF Stream Processing Workshop at ESWC2015
May 31th, 2015 in Portoroz, Slovenia
Important dates:
Submission for EoI: Friday March 6, 2015
Notification of acceptance: Friday April 3, 2015
Workshop days: Sunday May 31, 2015
From the webpage:
Motivation
Data streams are an increasingly prevalent source of information in a wide range of domains and applications, e.g. environmental monitoring, disaster response, or smart cities. The RDF model is based on a traditional persisted-data paradigm, where the focus is on maintaining a bounded set of data items in a knowledge base. This paradigm does not fit the case of data streams, where data items flow continuously over time, forming unbounded sequences of data. In this context, the W3C RDF Stream Processing (RSP) Community Group has taken the task to explore the existing technical and theoretical proposals that incorporate streams to the RDF model, and to its query language, SPARQL. More concretely, one of the main goals of the RSP Group is to define a common, but extensible core model for RDF stream processing. This core model can serve as a starting point for RSP engines to be able to talk to each other and interoperate.
Goal
The goal of this workshop is to bring together interested members of the community to:
- Demonstrate their latest advances in stream processing systems for RDF.
- Foster discussion for agreeing on a core model and query language for RDF streams.
- Involve and attract people from related research areas to actively participate in the RSP Community Group.
Each of these objectives will intensify interest and participation in the community to ultimately broaden its impact and allow for going towards a standardization process. As a result of this workshop the authors will contribute to the W3C RSP Community Group Report that will be published as part of the group activities.
As the world of technology continues to evolve and RDF does not, you have to admire the persistent of the RDF community in bolting RDF onto every new technical innovation.
I never thought the problem with RDF was with technological. No, rather the problem was: Why should I use your identifiers and relationships when I much prefer my own? Which include an implied basis I used to assign each identifier to a subject. The “implied” part being how we came to have multiple meanings for owl:sameAs. If I can’t see the “implied” part, I cannot agree or disagree with it.
[…] May 31th, 2015 in Portoroz, SloveniaMotivation"Data streams are an increasingly prevalent source of information in a wide range of domains and applications, e.g. environmental monitoring, disaster response, or smart cities. The RDF model is based on a traditional persisted-data paradigm, where the focus is on maintaining a bounded set of data items in a knowledge base. This paradigm does not fit the case of data streams, where data items flow continuously over time, forming unbounded sequences of data. In this context, the W3C RDF Stream Processing (RSP) Community Group has taken the task to explore the existing technical and theoretical proposals that incorporate streams to the RDF model, and to its query language, SPARQL." […]
Pingback by RDF Stream Processing Workshop at ESWC2015 &laq... — February 8, 2015 @ 5:35 pm