Categorization of interestingness measures for knowledge extraction by Sylvie Guillaume, Dhouha Grissa, and Engelbert Mephu Nguifo.
Abstract:
Finding interesting association rules is an important and active research field in data mining. The algorithms of the Apriori family are based on two rule extraction measures, support and confidence. Although these two measures have the virtue of being algorithmically fast, they generate a prohibitive number of rules most of which are redundant and irrelevant. It is therefore necessary to use further measures which filter uninteresting rules. Many synthesis studies were then realized on the interestingness measures according to several points of view. Different reported studies have been carried out to identify “good” properties of rule extraction measures and these properties have been assessed on 61 measures. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First to extend the number of the measures and properties to be studied, in addition to the formalization of the properties proposed in the literature. Second, in the light of this formal study, to categorize the studied measures. This paper leads then to identify categories of measures in order to help the users to efficiently select an appropriate measure by choosing one or more measure(s) during the knowledge extraction process. The properties evaluation on the 61 measures has enabled us to identify 7 classes of measures, classes that we obtained using two different clustering techniques.
It will take some time to run down the original papers but I am curious in the mean time if:
- Anyone agrees or disagrees with the reduction of measures as having different names (page 10)?
- Anyone agrees or disagrees with the classification of measures into seven groups (pages 10-11)?