You know, they really should offer a short course on writing effective paper titles.
Maybe I should offer a strictly non-credit course, once a month, say for 3 hours.
Consisting solely of re-writing article titles to be interesting, informative and != complete sentences. 😉
I found the data section part of the report puzzling because it appeared to me to present the data in both graphic as well as prose forms.
Puzzling because if the data could be clearly presented either way, then why both?
Not to mention that AOI appears 94 times in 24 page document.
The research itself is interesting and merits a better presentation that it gets in this paper.
Do read the paper and look past its editorial issues.
More research like this, at least in terms of the care shown the design and execution of the research, could prove to be quite useful.
That is assuming the resulting data is publicly archived.