I highly recommend your reading The CIA torture report belongs to the public by Lauren Harper.
I have quoted from Lauren’s introduction below as an inducement to read the article in full, but she fails to explore why a patriotic senator, staffer or agency head has not already leaked the CIA Torture Report?
It has already been printed, bound, etc., and who knows how many people were involved in every step of that process.
Do you seriously believe that report has gone unread except for its authors?
So far as I know, member of Congress, that “other” branch of the government, are entitled to make their own decisions about the handling of their reports.
What America needs now is a Senator or even a Senate staffer with more loyalty to the USA than to the bed wetters and torturers (same group) in the DoJ.
If you remember a part of the constitution that grants the DoJ the role of censor for the American public, please point it out in comments below.
From the post:
The American public’s ability to read the Senate Intelligence Committee’s full, scathing report on the Central Intelligence Agency’s torture program is in danger because David Ferriero, the archivist of the United States, will not call the report what it is, a federal record. He is refusing to use his clear statutory authority to label the report a federal record, which would be subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) disclosure requirements, because the Justice Department has told the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) not to. The DOJ has a long history of breaking the law to avoid releasing information in response to FOIA requests. The NARA does not have such a legacy and should not allow itself to be bullied by the DOJ.
The DOJ instructed the NARA not to make any determination on the torture report’s status as a federal record, ostensibly because it would jeopardize the government’s position in a FOIA lawsuit seeking the report’s release. The DOJ, however, has no right to tell the NARA not to weigh in on the record’s status, and the Presidential and Federal Records Act Amendments of 2014 gives the archivist of the United States the binding legal authority to make precisely that determination.
Democratic Sens. Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Dianne Feinstein of California revealed the DOJ’s insistence that the archivist of the United States not faithfully fulfill his duty in a Nov. 5, 2015, letter to Attorney General Loretta Lynch. They protested the DOJ’s refusal to allow its officials as well as those of the Defense Department, the CIA and the State Department to read the report. Leahy and Feinstein’s letter notes that “personnel at the National Archives and Records Administration have stated that, based on guidance from the Department of Justice, they will not respond to questions about whether the study constitutes a federal record under the Federal Records Act because the FOIA case is pending.” Rather than try to win the FOIA case on a technicality and step on the NARA’s statutory toes, the DOJ should allow the FOIA review process to determine on the case’s merits whether the document may be released.
Not even officials with security clearances may read the document while its status as a congressional or federal record is debated. The New York Times reported in November 2015 that in December of the previous year, a Senate staffer delivered envelopes containing the 6,700-page top secret report to the DOJ, the State Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Pentagon. Yet a year later, none of the envelopes had been opened, and none of the country’s top officials had read the report’s complete findings. This is because the DOJ, the Times wrote, “prohibited officials from the government agencies that possess it from even opening the report, effectively keeping the people in charge of America’s counterterrorism future from reading about its past.” The DOJ contends that if any agency officials read the report, it could alter the outcome of the FOIA lawsuit.
…
American war criminals who are identified or who can be discovered because of the CIA Torture Report should be prosecuted to the full extent of national and international law.
Anyone who has participated in attempts to conceal those events or to prevent disclosure of the CIA Torture Report, should be tried as accomplices after the fact to those war crimes.
The facility at Guantanamo Bay can be converted into a holding facility for DoJ staffers who tried to conceal war crimes. Poetic justice I would say.