Another Word For It Patrick Durusau on Topic Maps and Semantic Diversity

May 6, 2016

Computer Programming for Lawyers:… [Educating a Future Generation of Judges]

Filed under: Law,Programming,Python — Patrick Durusau @ 8:46 pm

Computer Programming for Lawyers: An Introduction by Paul Ohm and Jonathan Frankle.

From the syllabus:

This class provides an introduction to computer programming for law students. The programming language taught may vary from year-to-year, but it will likely be a language designed to be both easy to learn and powerful, such as Python or JavaScript. There are no prerequisites, and even students without training in computer science or engineering should be able successfully to complete the class.

The course is based on the premise that computer programming has become a vital skill for non-technical professionals generally and for future lawyers and policymakers specifically. Lawyers, irrespective of specialty or type of practice, organize, evaluate, and manipulate large sets of text-based data (e.g. cases, statutes, regulations, contracts, etc.) Increasingly, lawyers are asked to deal with quantitative data and complex databases. Very simple programming techniques can expedite and simplify these tasks, yet these programming techniques tend to be poorly understood in legal practice and nearly absent in legal education. In this class, students will gain proficiency in various programming-related skills.

A secondary goal for the class is to introduce students to computer programming and computer scientific concepts they might encounter in the substantive practice of law. Students might discuss, for example, how programming concepts illuminate and influence current debates in privacy, intellectual property, consumer protection, antidiscrimination, antitrust, and criminal procedure.

The language for this year is Python. The course website, http://paulohm.com/classes/cpl16/ does not have any problem sets posted, yet. Be sure to check back for those.

Recommend this to any and all lawyers you encounter. It isn’t possible to predict who will or will not be a judge someday. Judges with a basic understanding of computing could improve the overall quality of decisions on computer technology.

Like discounting DOJ spun D&D tales about juvenile behavior.

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress